How circumcision of both men and woman bring equality between sexes?Date Published - 2017-06-02 | Date Modified - 2017-06-24
The practice of circumcision is one of the most important factor that brings about an equality in both the sexes. The people who seek more information about circumcision should first know that circumcision protects the fundamental rights of the woman, just as it protects the fundamental rights of men.
How circumcision of both men and woman bring equality between sexes?
The pracitice of circumcision has been prevalent since more than 3000 years when the benefits of circumcision became known to human beings. It is a practice that was used in almost all the countries of the world. It was only after the world war II the performance of circumcision for the general public was stopped due to the shortage of funds at that time.
The process of circumcision in men and in women are the same. In both the cases it involves the removal of the prepuce ie. the foreskin of the underdeveloped head of the penis male and the hood of the underdeveloped clitoris in female. Circumcision leads to the underdeveloped head of the penis in males and the underdeveloped clitoris in female to get developed.
If you are a male who has not undergone circumcision then you will notice that the head of the penis is not developed completely ie. it has developed only to the level of muscular structure. There is no skin on the head of the penis. Likewise if you are a female you will notice that clitoris is not developed fully ie. it is developed only to the level of muscular structure. There is no skin on the clitoris.
Circumcision allows the completion of the development of the penis in male and the clitoris in female respectively.
During sexual activity a completely developed head of the penis and a completely developed clitoris will experience no pain but only wonderful sensations. But in uncircumcisised male and female the wonderful sensations are accompanied with pain. Uncircumcised people can just touch their underdeveloped head of the penis in males and underdeveloped clitoris in females to feel the pain. The pain in uncircumcised is perpetual, so the body tends to ignore it.
This underdeveloped part in the male and female also becomes a gateway for microorganisms to enter into the human body. As there is no skin the microorganisms can just drop into the body of the uncircumcised male and female.
Futher the prepuce in both male and female help the lodging of microorganisms and also rub them on the underdeveloped head of the penis in male and the underdeveloped clitoris in female, making the entry of microorganisms easier.
While males circumcision is still very previlent, there has been widespread protests against female cirumcision. Why are the protesters discriminating between men and woman? When men are allowed to complete the development of their underdeveloped penis, why are the women stopped from completing the development of their clitoris? Why are woman being forced to have sexual activity with bare muscular tissue which not only causes pain during intimacy but also causes perpetual pain, which is subdued by the body?
It also creates unhygenic conditions around the clitoris as it is filled with microorganisms and virions of viruses like HIV, Parkinsons disease etc.
The performance of female circumcision does not infringe the rights of the woman but gives them the rights equivalant to the rights of men to complete the development of the underdeveloped clitoris.
Female circumcision is not a violation against Human right but it gives the woman, who is also a woman a equal right just as her male partner to compelete the development of an essential part of their body. Futher it also does not infringe the rights of a child as it is done for the completion of the development of a part of the body and is just like a vaccination against diseases like HIV, Parkinsons disease etc.
Again to emphasis, the practice of female circumcision brings about the equality among male and female. Just as the male undergoes circumcision the female also is allowed to under circumcision which clearly brings about equality among sexes.
It also does not amount to any violation of rights of children, it instead gives the minor the ability to complete the development of the clitoris such that the minor is also protected from diseases like HIV, Parkinsons etc. It is to maintain the right of privacy of a child that it is done at a little matured age in children when a child understands the respects for clothing and it also makes it easier for the process to be done, as doing female circumcision before the age of 6-7 is difficult as the tissue of the hood is not fully grown and difficult to remove.
It is circumcision that completes the development of the underdeveloped clitoris. It is better than all the vaccinations available in the world because in every vaccination the body of the human being is violated by inserting a live or half dead microorganisms in the body, so that the body can indentify and create antibodies against that microorganisms when it really attacts the body. But in circumcision only a small tissue is cut and that not only completes the development of the underdeveloped clitoris but also provides protection against diseases like HIV, Parkinsons etc.
A person with common sense can guess which surface of the body will cause more pain, a surface without skin or a surface with skin. For those with less imagination, think of the time when you would have scraped the skin of your finger such that the muscle structure was exposed. The pain one feel when touching the muscle so exposed is the pain that suffered by an uncircumcised individual all through their life. The underdeveloped clitoris does not have a skin. So involving in sexual activity is a pain, there is lack of interest in sexual activity. But after circumcision when a proper skin is developed there is no pain during sexual activity, futher one would look forward to involving in sexual activity and lastly there cannot be any pain during urination because unination mostly does not touch the clitoris.
Female circumcision can in no way be categorised as violence against woman because it is what gives the woman freedom to complete the development of their underdeveloped clitoris, just like her male partner whose underdeveloped head of the penis is developed after circumcision.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) allows the practice of male circumcision which allows the completion of the developement of the head of the penis in male. But WHO discriminates aginst the woman not allowing the woman to develop the underdeveloped clitoris, so that the female continue to suffer from pain when performing sexual activity, while her male partner can enjoy a painless sexual activity with a circumcised and fully developed head of the penis. This is definitely discrimination of WHO against women.
Futher comparing Female Circumcision with FGM when even a child can say the difference between them. While Female circumcision involves only the removal of the hood of the clitoris, FGM involves the removal of other parts of the sexual organs of the woman. WHO has to answer serious questions in the future for their harsh decision against woman and womanhood by way of discriminating against them by prohibiting the performance of female circumcision. Why would WHO disciminate against woman and stop them so forcefully from completing the development of their clitoris? Why does WHO wants to see the woman in pain and suffering when she perfoms sexually activity with a muscle tissue that does not have a skin on it?
Taking the support of WHO many companies that are doing research in the field of diseases like HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases, have purposely organized campaigns against Female Circumcision because it is seen that women undergoing circumcision seems to develop resistance to these diseaes because their completely developed clitoris does not allow the entry of microorganisms into the their body that would cause huge losses to these companies.
Many women organisation also with the support of WHO, have backed the campaigns of these companies and not only termed Female circumcision as barbaric but also compared it to FGM. Atleast woman themselves can realise what is Female Circumcision and what is FGM and that Female Circumcision is clearly not FGM. FGM is banned in all the countries. But omparing Female Circumcision to FGM is a ruse by the companies to increase their profit marign and also discrimation against female by not allowing the completion of the development of clitoris. And it also is an barbaric act against woman to see them suffer from pain due to having sexual activity with just muscle tissue of clitoris while their circumcised male counterparts enjoy the activity with fully developed head of the penis.
The UN General Assembly should also look into the difference between Female Circumcision and FGM and should not take the right away from the women to get her underdeveloped clitoris developed.
Each and every uncircumcised individual should ask themselves why they should undergo perpetual pain and suffering by contining with the underdeveloped head of the penis in male and the underdeveloped clitoris in female, when a small procedure of circumcision can complete their development by growing a skin on the muscle structure.
Check out Youtube Video on How circumcision of both men and woman bring equality between sexes?
Other Press Releases
A cure for HIV, risky. But protection was, is and will always be circumcision
Can a once in a lifetime procedure of circumcision eradicate HIV?
Human Body can naturally Eradicate HIV
Facts about Circumcision - Scientific truth you should know
Clitoral Phimosis - the suffering of a girl
Circumcision is safe, effective and it stops your urine from entering your blood
Eradicate HIV today, or wait for the bomb of HIV pandemic to explode
Why Female Circumcision is legally not a part of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)?
HIV thrives as Circumcision continues to be an anti-medical procedure